Saturday 31 December 2011

Why BJP is still not the party of the poor?



  
  Why BJP is still not the party of the poor?

Bhartiya Janata Party, after thirty-plus years of existence, has still not been able to win hearts of the masses especially the rural poor of India.  We can argue that many urban poor vote for the BJP, but largely BJP is considered a party of the middle class, which in its own right is not a voter group and is certainly not bankable especially in view of the BJP's loss in the last election and the very recent Anna Hazare fiasco.  The middle class voter is deceptive and therefore limits the chances of BJP doing well in the next general election.  BJP badly needs something that could turn the poor in their favor.

Now let us analyze why poor do not vote for the BJP on a relative basis.

If we take a look at the regional parties, they seem to be doing far better than BJP even though they are fairly young.  Parties like BSP and SP from Uttar Pradesh, JD(U) in Bihar, BJD in Odisha have a fantastic rural voter base.  Tamil Nadu with different political dynamics also has parties with good rural base.  We can debate that these parties are regional and therefore are able to touch base with their voters quickly and effectively than the national party like BJP.  In a sense, regional parties have made it difficult for national party like BJP to penetrate in rural areas.

Another reason for this could be that it had been in power at the center for just 6-7 years and hence has not been able to make any goodwill among the rural voters.

BJP's central leadership is also partly responsible for this as well.  Other than the legendary Atal Bihari Vajpayee, none of their central leaders has impressed the masses.  Leaders like L. K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj, and Arun Jaitley spend more time in criticizing the Congress Party and Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh instead of reaching out to the poor and trying to woo them.  Has anybody seen L. K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj, or Arun Jaitley making a deliberate attempt to attract them?  I do not think so.

They have never talked about rural issues in a big way, have never announced any rural welfare scheme when in power, and have never even sounded caring about their problems.

Though I must agree some of their schemes like Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana are very good and have benefited the rural population, but their impact in converting votes is questionable.  They should do more to strike a cord with the “aam admi.”

By repeatedly using the word “Kamjor,” (kamjor pradhan mantri, kamjor Lokpal bill) they are sounding boring to many.  “Aap me kitana jor hai voh logon ko dikhaye na”

The ruling Congress Party has a strong rural base obviously because of its long history.  It also has expressed intent to do things for the poor and implemented schemes like farm loan waiver, NREGA, etc.  Although many of these schemes are marred with large scale corruption and are not more than a temporary relief,  these welfare schemes reflect well in the eyes of rural voter and that translates into votes for the Congress.

BJP should learn from Bihar Chief Minister, Nitish Kumar who has managed to impress the masses by implementing innovative welfare schemes.  He has done well so far and has been able to throw a mass leader like Lalu Yadav out of power.

BJP has not yet succeeded in getting votes of this section of society.  If BJP wants to come back to power in the next general election, they need to expand their voter base.  After all, 60-70% of India still lives in the rural area.  There is reasonable amount of time (2-3 years) still left for them to get their act together and focus on expanding their voter base.  Otherwise, I am not a psephologist, but their fortune might not change in a hurry.



Thursday 29 December 2011

No Lokpal; Well, Boo Ourselves


No Lokpal; Well, Boo Ourselves

Yesterday, an utterly disgraceful event in the Rajya Sabha demonstrated how our politicians behave when there is no deterrent like Anna to fear for. 

Anna's Mumbai fiasco has been a booster for the      politicians, and they have started justifying their misdeeds fearlessly.  Watch Rajniti Prasad on TV.

It was not one-of-its-kind event that took place yesterday. We have seen time and again how easily a few unruly members of parliament can create disruption and subvert the whole idea of democracy.  The fact that a few men can cause havoc in the parliament and disrupt the proceedings makes us believe that parliamentary democracy is nothing, but a big farce.  The whole Indian democratic set up got completely sabotaged by a very few men.  The most worrying thing is that this is not going to be a one-off event.  This has just set a very bad precedent and this is going to happen again and again and again.

Blame it on ourselves for what happened in the parliament yesterday.  By not listening to Anna’s call for agitation, we in a sense made a mistake.  We are too careless, too self-involved, and very less patriotic.

The Congress Party, which is in minority in the Rajya Sabha failed to take into confidence its own allies on the Lokayukta issue and hence completely fixed the last hour proceeding by creating a ruckus along with RJD.

A television channel exposed this dramatic event much before it actually happened.  Therefore instead of going for voting, they just organized a scripted drama and hushed up the proceedings thereafter.

Yesterday’s event in the Rajya Sabha certainly forces us to think why we need people like Anna in our democratic setup.

On the flip side, Team Anna failed to mobilize people for their agitation in Mumbai, and the whole event was a damp squib.  Why there was so much apathy towards the agitation is beyond my understanding.

Now the questions we need to ask ourselves are, firstly, do we need Anna to fight against corruption? Secondly, if this movement dies, what would be the nature of politics that we will see going forward?

The answers are YES, we need Anna and we should not let the movement die, as it would be catastrophic.

But in the meantime, do not feel surprised and sad if any big scam comes to light in the future.  Do not feel sad either if Lalu Yadav judges Anna Hazare.

Voh kehate hai na, Tab dhyan nahi diya, ab bhugto!!!

God bless this country and its countrymen.

Saturday 10 December 2011

UID In Jeopardy


UID In Jeopardy

The UPA-II's dream project, the Unique Identification Card project that it was very gung-ho about is getting into rough weathers.


First, it was the home ministry that raised serious questions about its reliability.  Then the NAC and NHRC have expressed reservations
on Aadhaar saying that it could lead to discrimination against minorities and those who do not have the Aadhaar number, and now
the parliamentary standing committee has also given it a thumbs down.

Therefore, the big question is if the UPA abandoning the project?

This is the thought that all of us are fearful of right now.

Now let us look at the noble cause of the government behind this project in the first place.

Unique Identification System is a system in which every citizen of a country will have a unique 16 digit number, Unique Identification
Number which would not just help the government track down individuals, but would make life far easier for citizens as they
would not have to submit multiple documents each time they want to avail a new service—public, private, government, regulatory authority or law-enforcement agency.  This system will contain details like the name, sex, address, marital status, photo, identification mark, and
face biometrics.

Now in how many ways this card could help the people of this country.  Other than the identity benefit, the first and the most important benefit that the UID can provide and where most of the corruption takes place in this country is confirmation of the entitlement actually reaching the intended beneficiary.  For example, a farmer getting his subsidy or other compensations directly credited in his bank account.

This means that Aadhaar could very well improve the delivery system of the government and therefore control corruption.

The home ministry and the parliamentary standing committee have suddenly woken up and started questioning the credibility of Aadhaar. One of the several questions raised by the home ministry about UID is its unsecured data.  Well, how the home ministry is going to get the secured data is beyond my understanding.  I bet the home ministry does not have records of all the criminals of this country.  We all know the blunders they committed when the ministry disclosed the list of most-wanted criminals living in Pakistan.

It is noteworthy that no previous government scheme has been 100% effective.  We all know there are flaws in all of them.  Even this project may not be 100% perfect, but after weighing the pros and cons, the good that will come out of this project will definitely outweigh the bad.

I feel there is a serious conspiracy going on to defame the UID and then scrap it altogether.  Earlier, we saw Mr. Nilekani being ridiculed on the TV talk shows by trivializing and naming the whole idea as a number project (will number the individuals) and then by various articles in the print media.

We need to be more alert and sensitive about the intentions of those who want to sabotage this project.  After all, we have a serious
job in our hand to help the lesser India (India that has neither seen India Shining, nor has seen Bharat Nirman) to help join the mainstream for inclusive growth.  India that is up until now irrelevant after 60 plus years of independence.  We must stand up and fight for that India.  We must fight for that aam aadmi who is nowhere in the picture and has no known existence and dies without a trace.  He, who is someone born here without a birth certificate and dies without a death certificate.  We must fight for those who even do not know what Aadhaar is and what good it can bring to them.

The opposition parties are also silent on this issue and have not aired their views very clearly.  We should question that silence.

Many people feel that the politicians are not going to let this UID happen because that would just reduce their importance.

The civil society is fighting a war against corruption.  They should also fight for UID. 

The politicians on the other hand have more responsibility as they govern the country and therefore could face Kolaveri Di from the
people of this country if they do not deliver.

Mr. Nilekani really has done a commendable job so far.  We must give credit to our prime minister as well for giving Mr. Nilekani all the financial as well as political support.


Therefore, we all should make sure that this project should get completed.